Batch Swap
Split liquidity across multiple DEXes for optimal rates
Batch Swap intelligently splits your trade across multiple DEX adapters in parallel, optimizing for the best combined rate while managing price impact.
Structure
┌──[DEX A: 60%]──┐
TokenA ──┤ ├──> TokenB
└──[DEX B: 40%]──┘Characteristics:
Multiple parallel routes
Same tokenIn and tokenOut
Liquidity splitting by percentage
Optimized for large orders
How It Works
Liquidity Distribution
The API calculates optimal splits based on:
Pool Depths - Available liquidity in each pool
Price Curves - Price impact at different volumes
Gas Costs - Additional overhead vs. rate improvement
Slippage - Combined slippage across routes
Example Calculation:
When Batch Swap is Used
The API automatically selects Batch Swap when:
✅ Multiple competitive pools - Several DEXes offer similar rates ✅ Large swap amounts - Price impact reduction justifies extra gas ✅ Rate improvement > Gas cost - Net benefit after considering fees ✅ Sufficient liquidity - Multiple pools can handle split amounts
Example Response
Real-World Example: 5 BNB → USDT
Breakdown:
Route 1: 3 BNB (60%) via PancakeSwapV3 → 1,740.74 USDT
Route 2: 2 BNB (40%) via UniswapV2 → 1,160.49 USDT
Total: 2,901.23 USDT
vs Single Route: ~2,895 USDT (saves ~$6)
Smart Contract Encoding
BatchSwapRoute Structure
Execution Flow
Gas Costs
2 DEXes
150k-200k
160k-220k
+30-50k vs Simple
3 DEXes
200k-280k
220k-320k
+60-100k vs Simple
4 DEXes
280k-350k
320k-450k
+100-150k vs Simple
Gas Cost Analysis:
Advantages
✅ Better Rates for Large Orders
Price Impact Comparison:
$10k
0.2%
0.15%
$5
$50k
1.2%
0.6%
$300
$100k
3.5%
1.5%
$2,000
$500k
15%
6%
$45,000
✅ Reduced Slippage Risk
Multiple pools = diversified price exposure:
Less vulnerable to single pool manipulation
Better average execution price
Lower total price impact
✅ Access More Liquidity
✅ Automatic Optimization
The API handles:
Optimal percentage splits
Gas cost calculations
Route selection
Slippage management
Limitations
❌ Higher Gas Costs
❌ Increased Complexity
More points of failure
Complex slippage calculations
Harder to debug
Potential atomic revert if one route fails
❌ Percentage Precision
Code Examples
JavaScript Implementation
Python Implementation
Best Practices
✅ Minimum Swap Amount
Only use batch swaps for amounts where improvement justifies gas:
✅ Monitor Individual Routes
✅ Set Conservative Slippage
Batch swaps have compounding slippage:
Troubleshooting
Issue: One Route Fails, Entire TX Reverts
Cause: Atomic execution - all routes must succeed
Solution:
Issue: Worse Rate Than Expected
Check:
Market moved between quote and execution
MEV sandwich attack
One pool had stale price
Solution:
Fetch fresh route
Use private transaction relay
Increase slippage slightly
Issue: High Gas Cost
Optimize:
Comparison Table
Gas Cost
120k
180k (+50%)
250k (+108%)
Rate
Baseline
+0.2-0.5%
+0.3-0.8%
Complexity
Low
Medium
High
Min Amount
Any
$100+
$500+
Slippage Risk
Single pool
Diversified
Most diversified
Related Topics
Simple Swap - Single DEX routing
Multi-Hop Swap - Sequential routing
Parallel Multi-Hop - Complex routing
Gas Optimization - Reduce costs
Summary
Batch Swap is ideal for:
✅ Large trades ($100k+)
✅ When multiple DEXes have competitive rates
✅ Price optimization over gas savings
✅ Reducing price impact
Use Simple Swap for:
❌ Small trades (<$100)
❌ When gas cost matters most
❌ Single pool has dominant liquidity
❌ Quick, straightforward swaps
Last updated